“We came to an agreement on the plan that we have, and it’s just a matter of trying to wrap it up tomorrow,” said Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
The White House was not as definitive on the results of the latest confab, though, with White House press secretary Jen Psaki calling the outcome “progress towards an outline of a potential agreement.”
“The President has invited the group to come to the White House tomorrow to discuss this in-person,” Psaki continued.
But in this lurching saga toward a bipartisan deal, where offers and counteroffers have been chewed up and spit out repeatedly by various factions, even “progress” toward a “potential agreement” seems like more than a glimmer of hope.
Lawmakers say there are still details to be worked out and that the group still needs to brief their caucuses and respective leaders.
“We haven’t written this down yet, and in terms of legislation, there’s going to be a lot that happens down the road,” said Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah.). “But we’ve agreed on a framework and we’re going to head to the White House.”
Collins said the group had agreed not to give out numbers on Wednesday night, but Manchin said he expected details would be released on Thursday.
The talks have been a tortuous process which started with Biden negotiating with a separate group of senators led by Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.). After weeks of meetings, those talks fell apart and Biden regrouped by turning to a bipartisan group of senators led by Manchin, Collins, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and others.
No matter what is in the agreement, it is likely to face challenges from the flanks of both parties.
Progressives in particular have been increasingly alarmed about the state of talks, fearing that climate goals will be watered down. They have been pushing in recent weeks to ensure that any potential bipartisan bill would be followed by a larger reconciliation package where broader progressive goals can be advanced.
“We have made our position clear, that the possibility of a bipartisan deal depends on a commitment to move forward on reconciliation,” said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) earlier this week.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has repeatedly said that infrastructure is an area of potential bipartisan agreement, but has not yet signed on to the group’s deal.
“The devil’s in the details and we’ll have to make sure there’s not some kind of hidden tax increase in there, and I want to see that it’s credibly paid for,” he said during a radio appearance earlier Wednesday.
The topline for new spending on the proposal has now shifted to $559 billion, based on repurposing $20 billion in broadband funds, according to a source familiar with the matter. The source added that a tentative agreement on the framework is possible.
James Bikales, Laura Barrón–López and Burgess Everett contributed to this report.